|
Surface opacity and phonological issues in Klamath and Lushootseed
Miae Park
Ph.D. Dissertation, 2000
Abstract
In several recent phonological theories and in particular in Optimality
Theory, serial derivations are eliminated entirely from underlying-surface
mappings in phonological analyses. The overall goals of this dissertation
are to provide arguments that serial derivations are required in underlying-surface
mappings by examining cases of surface opacity found in two American Indian
languages, Klamath and Lushootseed, and to provide an alternative constraint-based
Lexical Phonology account in which only a restricted form of phonological
derivation is allowed. I show that various leading proposals made to handle
surface opacity within the non-serial versions of OT cannot characterize
the opacity cases in Klamath that are created by the interaction between
phonology and reduplicative morphology and by the interaction of purely
phonological rules. I argue that those proposals are inadequate on both
theoretical and empirical grounds and that the opacity cases found in
this language provide strong evidence for the necessity of serial derivation
between underlying and surface representations. I show that in Lushootseed,
the diminutive allomorphy, a case of the emergence of the unmarked, provides
support for a constraint-based account, whereas the opaque interaction
of the diminutive allomorphy with vowel reduction and syncope, which cannot
be properly handled within the non-derivational OT framework, provides
evidence for a derivational account. I argue that the diminutive allomorphy
and its opaque interaction with vowel reduction and syncope in Lushootseed
pave the way for a constraint-based derivational account. I reanalyze
the opacity cases in Klamath and Lushootseed within the constraint-based
Lexical Phonology framework and show that a restricted form of serial
derivation that follows from the organization of the grammar provides
a sufficient and principled account of the surface opacity found in the
two languages, eliminating the problematic B-R correspondence relationship,
constraint parameterization and sympathy. The innovations needed in the
constraint-based LP framework are (1) the base-derivative faithfulness
relation, which holds between the optimal output of a cycle or level and
its derivative on a subsequent derivation, and (2) constraint rerankings
on a level-by-level basis.
|
|